In their dialogue, Daniel Mael and Peter Beinart explore the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, engaging deeply with themes of human rights, military necessity, and the pursuit of political resolutions.
Those that continue to pretend ApartheidIsrael is not executing a genocide are soulless. My priority is to convince even one person to not waste their energy reading, listening or interacting to such soulless creatures. This helps keep some semblance of sanity in such evil times.
How did you come down with such a bad case of Islamic deflectionism?
Is it being born sinful as a crucifixionist and thus needing to project the eternal scapegoat factor from your crucifixionist variation upon the Jews in real time as they fight back against jihad and to release their starved hostages?
Or is it intersectionalist leftist politics that has polluted your thinking process to show empathy towards jihad?
Either way that's some fucked up analysis, may your empathy for barbarians result in unsympathetic outcomes as you encounter them forever more
Right, why is Marwan Bargouti still in prison if Israel can't deal with Palestine because it can't present an effective popular government? They don't want that, they want a lack of credible leadership so the can continue the genocide
This was a waste of time. Im sorry peter had to waste his time with this clown.
G-d forbid Peter talks to someone with whom he disagrees! The horror!
Those that continue to pretend ApartheidIsrael is not executing a genocide are soulless. My priority is to convince even one person to not waste their energy reading, listening or interacting to such soulless creatures. This helps keep some semblance of sanity in such evil times.
How did you come down with such a bad case of Islamic deflectionism?
Is it being born sinful as a crucifixionist and thus needing to project the eternal scapegoat factor from your crucifixionist variation upon the Jews in real time as they fight back against jihad and to release their starved hostages?
Or is it intersectionalist leftist politics that has polluted your thinking process to show empathy towards jihad?
Either way that's some fucked up analysis, may your empathy for barbarians result in unsympathetic outcomes as you encounter them forever more
Bless Your Heart ♥️
Ruti
So give back the rest of the hostages.
they guy on the left is commie pinko kapo
Peter should go to Gaza and volunteer for Hamas. He'd be much happier.
The level of whataboutism here is unreal. What’s funny about this video is that it made it to my feed as a dunk on Zionists.
Sickening that anyone can defend Israel’s “right to genocide- oh whoops “right to defend its —genocide”…
Right, why is Marwan Bargouti still in prison if Israel can't deal with Palestine because it can't present an effective popular government? They don't want that, they want a lack of credible leadership so the can continue the genocide
Mistake #6: pretending Hamas is more terroristic than the Israeli state
It is illegal to withhold the essentials of life for a civilian population for tactical purposes
What army doesn't secure it's ability to remain alive, at all costs
Error #6: continuing to argue with a moral relativist about ethical laws
Error #5: conflating democracy with theocracy. Dismissing democratic values as practical values. Keeping morals practical is essential to democracy
Error #4: expecting Peter to accept moral relativist arguments
Error #3: imagining that more than a tiny fraction of Palestinians can maintain distance necessary to engage socially with Jewish Israelia
Error #2: imagining Peter could implement a just address of Palestinian grievances and remain a PM or even alive
Error#1: calling the extermination or a captive population a "war".